At the September 21, 2023 Conference of the Global Investigations Review, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Marshall Miller announced actions by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to further incentivize companies engaged in M&A to prioritize compliance. Miller affirmed that “acquiring companies should be rewarded—rather than penalized—when they engage in careful pre-acquisition diligence and post-acquisition integration to detect and remediate misconduct at the acquired company’s business.”[1] He noted that in practice, “… [Main Justice’s] Criminal Division has declined to take enforcement action against companies that have promptly and voluntarily self-disclosed misconduct uncovered in the mergers and acquisitions context and then remediated and cooperated with the Justice Department in prosecuting culpable individuals,” and that the DOJ “will be looking to apply that same approach Department-wide.”[2]
Continue Reading DOJ Announces Additional Guidance on Voluntary Self-Disclosure in M&A ContextThe German M&A Market – Q3/2023
Please click here for the latest edition of the Cleary Gottlieb M&A Telegram for Germany.
New Delaware Ruling Highlights Unintended Consequences of Excluding Officers from Fiduciary Duty Waivers
Delaware law provides parties with significant flexibility to restrict or eliminate fiduciary duties in LLC agreements. Sophisticated parties regularly take advantage of this flexibility by eliminating fiduciary duties of members and directors of LLCs. These same parties, however, often choose not to extend these waivers to officers of the LLCs, often stemming from a desire to ensure that officers still have a fiduciary duty to be loyal to the LLC. A new ruling from the Delaware Court of Chancery highlights the unintended consequences of excluding officers from the scope of the fiduciary duty waiver.
Continue Reading New Delaware Ruling Highlights Unintended Consequences of Excluding Officers from Fiduciary Duty WaiversBringing an End to “Derivative” Section 14(a) Claims – Without Waiting for the Supreme Court to Weigh In
Much has been written lately about a circuit split on the question whether a company’s forum selection bylaw mandating shareholder derivative lawsuits be brought in Delaware state court trumps a federal lawsuit asserting a derivative claim under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (which can only be asserted – if at all – in federal court). The Seventh Circuit answered this question “no”[1] while the Ninth Circuit sitting en banc answered “yes,”[2] in both cases over vigorous dissents. Many have speculated that the U.S. Supreme Court may weigh in to resolve this clear circuit split.
Continue Reading Bringing an End to “Derivative” Section 14(a) Claims – Without Waiting for the Supreme Court to Weigh InNew SEC Disclosure Rules for Cybersecurity Incidents and Governance and Key Takeaways
On July 26, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) adopted rules to enhance and standardize disclosure requirements related to cybersecurity incident reporting and cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance.
Continue Reading New SEC Disclosure Rules for Cybersecurity Incidents and Governance and Key TakeawaysSweeping Changes to Premerger (HSR) Process in the United States Proposed by Enforcement Agencies
Changes Would Multiply Time, Burden, and Expense for All Filings, Even for Transactions With No Competition Concerns
The U.S. FTC and DOJ have proposed sweeping changes to the pre-merger process in the United States under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act.[1]
The changes would not affect whether a transaction is subject to the reporting requirements. But for those transactions where an HSR filing is required, the changes would, in a word, be massive.
Continue Reading Sweeping Changes to Premerger (HSR) Process in the United States Proposed by Enforcement AgenciesNew York Advances Towards Banning All Non-Competes
Earlier this week, the New York State legislature passed a bill banning all non-competes entered into on or after 30 days past the bill’s enactment, including those entered into by employees or in connection with the sale of a business. If the bill becomes law, it would make New York the fifth state in the U.S. to enact a ban on non-competes. California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma have also enacted bans on non-competes, but theirs do not go as far as New York’s full ban, instead banning only employee non-competes, but preserving those that are entered into in connection with the sale of a business.
Continue Reading New York Advances Towards Banning All Non-CompetesThe German M&A Market – Q2/2023
Please click here for the latest edition of the Cleary Gottlieb M&A Telegram for Germany.
Updates on Non-Competes
Minnesota bans new employee non-competes beginning July 1, 2023, and the United Kingdom intends to cap their duration at 3 months
Minnesota Becomes the 4th U.S. State to Ban Employee Non-Competes
Following in the footsteps of California, North Dakota and Oklahoma, Minnesota has banned all employee non-competes beginning July 1, 2023, and bars employers from utilizing choice-of-law or choice-of-venue clauses in an attempt to use a more favorable state’s law as a workaround. Importantly, the new law is not retroactive and does not affect other employee restrictions, such as confidentiality and non-solicitation covenants.
Continue Reading Updates on Non-CompetesNasdaq and NYSE Propose October 2, 2023 as Effective Date in Amendments to its Proposed Clawback Listing Standards
[Note: This post has been updated to reflect the SEC’s approval of the Nasdaq and NYSE amendments.]
On Friday, June 9, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved, on an accelerated basis, each of the Nasdaq Stock Market’s (“Nasdaq”) and the New York Stock Exchange’s (“NYSE”) proposed listing standards, as modified by the Exchanges’ respective amendments from last week, implementing the requirement for issuers to adopt and disclose “no fault” clawback policies providing for the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation.[1]
Continue Reading Nasdaq and NYSE Propose October 2, 2023 as Effective Date in Amendments to its Proposed Clawback Listing Standards